Michael, Any luck in answering your last question?:
"I was really hoping to <do> simultaneous TX/RX using - just- the TX/RX antenna on an RFX board, but I've had no luck doing that. Anyone know if this last scenario is possible?" I am very much interested in the same functionality. Thanks, Rob Michael Dickens-2 wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Eric Blossom wrote: >> There's no gr_stall. Currently auto_tr mode is used with the packet >> data examples. See gnuradio-examples/python/digital. There is no >> explicit "stall", the transmitter pipeline stalls when no packets are >> being fed into the PHY via the message source. > > OK. Well, I'll create a "stall" block and see how it works under a > standard PTT scenario. > > Upon further reflection, I think doing simultaneous TX/RX might work > better when doing the "push" of PTT. That way I can see the TXd > signal on the RX side - but then mute it so that the (loopback) sound > doesn't come through. From reading the GNU Radio list archives, > doing simultaneous TX/RX seems possible using either separate TX and > RX daughtercards, or different antennas on a single RFX series > daughtercard. I was really hoping to to simultaneous TX/RX using - > just- the TX/RX antenna on an RFX board, but I've had no luck doing > that. Anyone know if this last scenario is possible? Thanks again. > - MLD > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/set_auto_tr%28%29%2C-gr_stall%2C-and-PTT-tp12600639p14538630.html Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
