A while back we did some clean up of the USRP examples, removing some bit-rotted cruft, and moving the commonly used programs into gr-utils.
These included things like usrp_fft.py, usrp_rx_cfile.py, and those scripts that over time have become more utilities than examples. In the gr-utils component, we are now installing these into the $prefix/bin directory, so they'll end up on the user's PATH and be callable from anywhere without prefixing them with the examples path. However, a common convention on Linux, at least on Debian, Ubuntu, and derived systems (probably Redhat too), is to strip the language specific extension off scripts in the path. Would anyone have any heartache if we did this for the gr-utils scripts as well as the relatively few other scripts we install on the path? usrp_fft.py -> usrp_fft usrp_rx_cfile.py -> usrp_rx_cfile etc. It's not a critical item, but if we do this, it will need to be before the 3.1 stable branch is officially released. -- Johnathan Corgan Corgan Enterprises LLC http://corganenterprises.com _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
