http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_spectrum http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/framing_openspectrum.html http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2003/03/12/spectrum/index.html http://www.reed.com/dprframeweb/dprframe.asp?section=openspec http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003708.shtml
On 7/26/07, Philip Balister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some more takes on the FCC position. > > My favorite is the second. The line "The Software Defined Radio (SDR) > Forum politely responded that the FCC did not know what it was doing > and asked it to get a clue." amuses me. >> http://internetcommunications.tmcnet.com/topics/enterprise/ articles/8305-sflc-releases-white-paper-fcc-rules-software-defined.htm > http://reclaimthemedia.org/legislation_and_regulation/ fcc_doesnt_know_what_its_talki=5340 > http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/communications/0%2c39044192% 2c62028023%2c00.htm
> > Philip > > On 7/26/07, David Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:05:07PM -0700, John Clark wrote:> > > , but because of the FCC's paranoia (and other regulatory agencies
> > > around the world...), > > > > John, > >> > Does any written statement from the FCC give credence to the "regulatory > > excuse" for keeping the Atheros HAL closed? Atheros cites the FCC's
> > SDR NPRM, which doesn't really apply. > > > > Dave > > > > -- > > David Young OJC Technologies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
