Eric Blossom writes: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:38:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > Just to confirm that a new checkout and configure did not help. > > > > > > > > Any other suggestions? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > Try adding /usr/local/lib64 to ld.so.conf in addition to > > > /usr/local/lib, then run ldconfig. > > > > > > Eric > > > > Eric, > > > > OK, I tried that - but I still get the same error message. I don't > > understand why this should work - no libraries have been installed to > > /usr/local yet, so why do I need to alter the ldconfig path? (Or is > > this a strange 'feature' of libtool?) > > > > Thanks again for all your help, > > > > Matt > > > Are you specifying > > --prefix <FOO> > > to the configure command? > > If so, you'll need to add <FOO>/lib and <FOO>/lib64 to ld.so.conf. > This bogus requirement is a result of a seriously flawed "fix" by the > Debian libtool maintainer ( != the upstream libtool maintainer). The > changes that Debian has made (which Ubuntu uses) break the ability to > test code before installation. The full story is kind of involved, > and has to do with them coding a --rpath into the executables BEFORE > they are installed. > > Eric
No, there is no --prefix operator supplied. Thanks for the explanation, and again for all yor help. Matt _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
