On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > > >No particular fault. However, the outputs from the USRP are almost > >always some kind of complex values. They may be encoded as 16-bit I & > >Q, or 8-bit I & Q or 4-bit or 2-bit or 1-bit. The question is how do > >we want to deal with them downstream from the USRP? The existing > >usrp.source_s could be considered broken (although there are users of > >it.) The data is really interleaved 16-bit I & Q, though it's > >presented as if each sample was only 16-bits wide. In fact a "sample" > >is really composed of 2 16-bit values. > > > > > Maybe we should make gr_complex_short be a typedef for complex<short> > and output those. > > Matt
That would make sense. We'd need to come up with some kind of unambiguous naming convention for the variants. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
