Tom - Yes, that will work just fine. That's the initial fix I did
yesterday. Since it sounds like defining "ssize_t d_payload_size"
isn't OK, then I'll just delete my branch. Those were easy changes
anyway. Thanks for getting it fixed quickly; everyone with 64-bit
processor/OS/compiler will breathe easier ;) - MLD
Sorry about this one, but try it now. I just did a check in to the
trunk since it was so simple. Although I might have been better to
redefine d_payload_size to a ssize_t, there are issues with that
data type and SWIG; it didn't like me using ssize_t in the
constructor argument. Instead, it's now being cast to a (ssize_t)
in the std::min function. That should be generic on any system.
Let me know if this works or not.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
