Brett L. Trotter wrote: > Yay- congratulations- transferred 100MB successfully and all of my > 'stumbler' packets- even with UDP.
You're using FSP (which goes over UDP), correct? FSP has a retry mechanism, so good. Glad it's working now! > I'm going to continue work on the 8b/10b, because I still think > that's the closest 'real' solution to the issue- and the overhead > isn't as severe as repeating 1500 byte packets- Well, only the "stumbler" packets get repeated, and as you found, there were only five in 10,000 that you tried. So your overhead isn't 100%, it's no different than if your channel dropped one in 2000 packets. (For those following, the problem before resulted in a complete link failure, as the retransmitted packets on the connection would always fail CRC.) > Worst case, it can be an option in the python that most people can > leave turned off. An 8b/10b line coding scheme would probably be best implemented as a standalone hierarchical block that a developer could choose to use or not as part of a flow graph implementing a transmit and receive path. > FYI: Am achieving nearly 100kb/s with -r 800k on a BasicTX Is that bytes or bits per second? -- Johnathan Corgan Corgan Enterprises LLC http://corganenterprises.com _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
