On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 17:12 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > > >doesn't it look like the USB 2.0 is a heavily constraining bottleneck? > > > > > > > > Yes, USB2.0 is the bottleneck. > > > > >And, if I'm not wrong about this, will it be possible in the future to > > >have a USRP <--> PC interface which doesn't limit us so much. > > > > > > > > Other than 802.11, there aren't many applications that require more than > > 8 MHz of bandwidth. Radio astronomy is one, but you can use fewer bits > > > For what it's worth, here's an simple 1st attempt to make a montage > of 8MHz plots to show a wide band (240MHz of Galaxy 10R at 123W, > Ku vertical): > > http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/123w_3.jpg (1MB) > > The LNB lo is 10750M, so where it says "968" the actual f is 11718MHz, > etc. Using DBSRX. > > --Chuck
Nice. You may want to try using the middle 6 or 7 MHz instead of the whole 8 when pasting it together. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
