On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:11:37PM -0400, Marcus Leech wrote: > > I'm having a hard time believing that processing ATSC video is a > *less* CPU-intensive application than pulsar processing, but I could > be completely wrong. >
We'll see ;) We know more now then we knew then (good thing!) We can use fft based filtering, which should speed up a lot of the code. In addition, if we stick to training the equalizer only on the VSB data field sync, we can use fft filtering in the equalizer for 311 out of 312 data segments in every field. The equalizer is currently running 256 taps at 10.76 MS/sec. Moving from N^2 to N log N should help. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
