Matt Ettus wrote:
Very cool. Thanks for doing all this development on the RA receiver.
I'm very excited to see where it goes.
Matt
Now that I understand a bit more of the internals, it's really starting
to gell for me.
Some things I'd like to add:
o interference stopping
o recording the FFT results, without having to define a whole new
chain (I'm at 50-60% CPU already!!)
[I might pull the same trick here that I did with
ra_stripchartsink--define a "calibration" function that
can record data as a side-effect. I'd simply make an
ra_fftsink that does this].
o Possible integration of PyFits (although whether it makes sense
to do it in real time remains to be seen)
o Deriving the total power from the FFT results, eliminating the
parallel total-power chain
It would be interesting and cool at some point to demonstrate an FX
correlator using a pair or trio (or quad, or pentad :-)
of USRPs with appropriate front-ends and antennae. In an FX
correlator (which is a style that's currently in vogue)
you compute the FFT before computing the various cross products. It
has more manageable data structure than
X-F correlators for RA use. You can see that you can martial the
various FFT bins off to different CPUs for
further processing in an FX design, and thus control, to some extent,
the herculean data flow that occurs in
these RA systems...
--
Marcus Leech Mail: Dept 1A12, M/S: 04352P16
Security Standards Advisor Phone: (ESN) 393-9145 +1 613 763 9145
Strategic Standards
Nortel Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
