Alfred A. Aburto Jr. wrote:
Why Marcus? I don't understand ...
Just in case that wasn't sarcasm.
On the "ashamed to be an engineer" aspect--look at the ARDG (Analog
Reconversion Discussion Group) page at the
http://www.ctpwg.org website. Given the large number of technology
submissions to this group, there must
be plenty of engineers who actually think this can be made to work,
for suitable definitions of "work".
On the "USRP will be illegal" aspect. With a 60Mhz high-dynamic-range
A/D onboard, it clearly falls under
the purview of what ARDG is targetting. In fact, I actually thought
last night of a way USRP could be
used to create a technology-neutral watermark eliminator, as a
pre-processor for an "ARDG encumbered"
video digitization system.
This stuff is nonsense, in so many dimensions, I cannot believe that
rational people can propose this
sort of stuff.
I'm a Canadian, which means that I don't have any congresscritters to
bother.
--
Marcus Leech Mail: Dept 1A12, M/S: 04352P16
Security Standards Advisor Phone: (ESN) 393-9145 +1 613 763 9145
Strategic Standards
Nortel Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
