Ohh, I thought my bad! Thanks a lot. There is only a slight problem.
This is what I get. It adds an additional statement into relay IR ( %3 =
add(%x1, %y1);) and returns the result.
```
fn (%x1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32], %y1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32]) {
%0 = add(%x1, %y1);
%1 = subtract(%x1, %y1);
%2 = multiply(%0, %1);
%3 = add(%x1, %y1);
(%2, %3)
}
```
This is ideally, what I'd like to create. @mbrookhart -- Is there something
that I can do to fix this?
```
fn (%x1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32], %y1: Tensor[(1, 1, 1, 20), float32]) {
%0 = add(%x1, %y1);
%1 = subtract(%x1, %y1);
%2 = multiply(%0, %1);
(%2, %0)
}
```
[quote="mbrookhart, post:6, topic:9307, full:true"]
return this `super().visit_call(call)`
[/quote]
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/changing-return-of-relay-function-or-irmodule/9307/7)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/fd7043df1676b5c46a00f21115858ac75c046df26a33d934cc10e8298d00c490).
