On 05/03/12 22:27, Ezequiel García wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ezequiel García <elezegar...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know: >> >> 1. What is the current v4l video provider interface status? >> >> 2. Are there any users of it? Can someone tell me *one* relevant use case? >> >> 3. Is there any reason for keeping v4l1 support, considering >> it has been superseeded by v4l2 a while ago? (I could help cleaning that up). >> > > ping >
Sorry, too busy at the moment :-/ 1. I haven't tested it for years. 2. Last time a few years ago it was used for video surveillance. 3. We can drop it, any help is very welcome! -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
