Vijay, Check your link order, For it to be statically working correctly, the link order should be fine. I got it working recently. Check the following post for reference http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2008-October/004614.html
Srini... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to do a static build of the library for arm-linux. DirectFB > (1.2.5) compiles fine, then the example applications also compile fine > with it. However, when I run any example app, it fails complaining > something like this: > (*) DirectFB/Core: Single Application Core. (2008-10-14 08:20) > (!) DirectFB/core/system: No system found! > > Looking closely at src/core/system.c and lib/direct/modules.c, it looks > like the only way system modules can be loaded is when they are built > dynamically. In fact, the method direct_modules_explore_directory in > lib/direct/modules.c only has code to look for modules when > DYNAMIC_LINKING is defined and it only looks for .so modules. Has anyone > solved these problems? > > Btw, I am using directfb-config to get the right flags and everything > does compile fine. It seems like the runtime support for static builds > just isn't there. > > Any help is appreciated. > Thanks, > Vijay > _______________________________________________ > directfb-dev mailing list > directfb-dev@directfb.org > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev > -- Srinivas Rao M Hamse <http://msrinirao.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
