2008/10/7 Niels Roest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > With the same gdb error stack?
Tomorrow I'll assemble debug and can answer your question. I think that's the same problem : http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-users/2008-October/001078.html > > Nikita Egorov wrote: >> >> You are right, I was using not the latest version. >> But new version from git fails too and prints "Buffer allocation failed" >> before. >> >> >> 2008/10/7, Niels Roest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> >>> Which DirectFB version are you using? >>> The buffer pool negotiation has changed between 1.2 and 1.3, they are >>> binary incompatible. >>> You can try to rebuild everything, and watch if you have any warnings >>> during compilation. >>> >>> hth >>> Niels >>> >>> >>> Nikita Egorov wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I'd found such strange behavior of the dfb_surface_pools_negotiate() >>>> function. In branch 1.0.0 my code was working fine. >>>> >>>> My source: >>>> DFBSurfaceDescription desc; >>>> memset(&desc,0,sizeof(DFBSurfaceDescription)); >>>> desc.flags = >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> (DSDESC_CAPS|DSDESC_WIDTH|DSDESC_HEIGHT|DSDESC_PIXELFORMAT|DSDESC_PREALLOCATED; >>> >>>> >>>> desc.caps = DSCAPS_SYSTEMONLY; >>>> desc.pixelformat = pix_format; >>>> desc.height = height; >>>> desc.width = width; >>>> >>>> desc.preallocated[0].data = src; >>>> desc.preallocated[0].pitch = bytes_per_line; >>>> >>>> The surface is created without any problems. >>>> >>>> Then I invoke the Blit() and it fails when >>>> dfb_surface_pools_negotiate() returns the error UNSUPPORTED for source >>>> surface. >>>> >>>> Call stack: >>>> dfb_surface_pools_negotiate (buffer=0x100b2f88, access=CSAF_CPU_READ, >>>> ret_pools=0x7fd8b7c0, max_pools=4, ret_num=0x7fd8b7f4) >>>> at surface_pool.c:313 >>>> #1 0x0ff68ec4 in dfb_surface_pools_allocate (buffer=0x100b2f88, >>>> access=CSAF_CPU_READ, ret_allocation=0x7fd8b83c) at surface_pool.c:462 >>>> #2 0x0ff63b08 in dfb_surface_buffer_lock (buffer=0x100b2f88, >>>> access=CSAF_CPU_READ, lock=0x100ae920) at surface_buffer.c:192 >>>> #3 0x0ff62e38 in dfb_surface_lock_buffer (surface=0x100b2d80, >>>> role=CSBR_FRONT, access=CSAF_CPU_READ, ret_lock=0x100ae920) >>>> at surface.c:546 >>>> #4 0x0ff379dc in gAcquire (state=0x100ae850, accel=DFXL_BLIT) >>>> at generic.c:6787 >>>> #5 0x0ff4b6d8 in dfb_gfxcard_blit (rect=0x7fd8ba20, dx=0, dy=0, >>>> state=0x100ae850) at gfxcard.c:1717 >>>> #6 0x0fedd170 in IDirectFBSurface_Blit (thiz=0x100adfb0, >>>> >>> >>> source=0x100b2fc8, >>> >>>> >>>> sr=0x7fd8baac, dx=0, dy=0) at idirectfbsurface.c:1600 >>>> >>>> I have not enough experience to dig deeper. I'm afraid it will take >>>> too much time.:( >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> .------------------------------------------. >>> | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | >>> | http://www.directfb.org/ | >>> "------------------------------------------" >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > > .------------------------------------------. > | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | > | http://www.directfb.org/ | > "------------------------------------------" > -- Best Regards Nikita Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
