> "changing of wrong order of bytes on-the-fly" is the easy way but it will > use more the CPU.
Do you mean CPU loading? It is not quite right. For example, in my case with PowerPC architecture I have replaced only _one_ CPU command ( Load Word => Load Word Byte Reverse) . Thus, there is no difference for CPU at all ! Second,the memcpy() function is working without any changing, as is ! Third, in assembler code of real function processing gfx data the "Store/Load" commands are seldom and adding one command ( as in last case ) make worse the speed of work only a few percent or less.. -- Best Regards Nikita Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
