On 2019-05-12 17:33:16 +0000, kdevel said:
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 09:15:41 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 06:30:56 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Our focus is executable size (I'm an old school guy) and speed.
What about correctness?
Correctness of what? Of the framework? Of course...
Don't want to curb anybody's ambitions but I see massive aliasing in
the space and in the time domain.
Not sure what you mean by this... it's a simple prototype. And, if you
minify a responsive layout at some point your get rounding errors in.
If course the screencast shows an artificial case.
I actually wanted to post a link to the antigrain website, which,
however, was removed after its author had passed away 2013. Apparently
there is no archive copy of that impressing website. Remains: Wikipedia
[1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Grain_Geometry
Of couse we know AGG. Quality and speed is better than AGG.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster
