On 2018-05-22 20:20, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I see that I'm writing

try {
... different code ...
} catch (myException e) {
     ... same handling code ...
}

over and over again.

Of course I can put the exception handling code into a function to not duplicate it. However, I still need to write this construct over and over again. Is there a way to handle it more generic? Like:

??? (... code ...);

or

??? { ... code ...};

Where ??? would do the try and re-use the exception handling code everytime? I hope this is understandable.


You can always create a function that takes a delegate or lambda and handles the exception in the function. Here are three versions of the same thing, depending on how you want the call site to look like.

void handleException1(alias dg)()
{
    try dg();
    catch (Exception e) { /* handle exception */ }
}

void handleException2(lazy void dg)
{
    try dg();
    catch (Exception e) { /* handle exception */ }
}

void handleException3(scope void delegate () dg)
{
    try dg();
    catch (Exception e) { /* handle exception */ }
}

void main()
{
    handleException1!({
        writeln("asd");
    });

    handleException1!(() => writeln("asd"));

    handleException2(writeln("asd"));

    handleException3({
        writeln("asd");
    });
}

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to