On 03/06/2017 10:03 AM, Mike B Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 00:02:54 UTC, Lewis wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 20:47:31 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
[...]
For sure. I actually want to post the source code at some point, but
the changes I made are very much set up specifically for this project.
I'll sift through at some point and see if I can gather together
something worth posting.
[...]
Thanks. Maybe some of this could be overcome by a design pattern that
removes them from being an issue(e.g., script can not use GC... only to
demonstrate that if that were the case, then you wouldn't have to worry
about GC issues ;)?
I imagine that if "dll"'s were used that one would have all the power to
debug and develop them as normal d code, which is nice and doesn't
require a "script editor and debugger".
A lot of this can be done by simply implementing shared libraries fully
on Windows. There is a reason why TypeInfo doesn't cross the dll
boundary right now. Sadly it isn't a high priority (and it really really
needs to be "just done already"). Its fine for Linux.
