On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 20:54:34 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:16:28 +0000, Gerald Jansen wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 21:24:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
While this is no fancy range-based code, and one might say
it's more hackish and C-like than idiomatic D, the problem is
that current D compilers can't quite optimize range-based
code to this extent yet. Perhaps in the future optimizers
will improve so that more idiomiatic, range-based code will
have comparable performance with fastcsv.
... data crunching ... I'm wondering how general your
statement above might be at this time w.r.t. this and possibly
other domains.
You can get fewer large allocations by reading the whole file
at once manually and using slices into that large allocation.
Sure, that part is clear. Presumably the quoted comment referred
to more than just that technique.
