On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 12:49:36 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Is there any way (or could there be any way, in the future) of
getting the code from lambda expressions as a string?
I've noticed that if I have an error with a lambda that looks
like, say
x=>x+a
the error message will come up referring to it as
(x) => x + a
so some level of processing has already been done on the
expression. Can I get at any of it during compilation? It would
be useful for automatic program rewriting.
Short answer: no. .codeof for functions is something I've wanted
for ages, but no movement so far.
