On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Philippe Sigaud <philippe.sig...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I expected such an answer and I do understand the decisions behind it. Yet, >> you gave me a really GOOD news! Having to write cast(ubyte) 1 was way too >> much verbose for my liking, while the new ubyte(1) is reasonable enough. > > Why not use `1u`?
Ow! Ignore that. 1u is an uint, not an ubyte.
