On Saturday, 18 January 2014 at 22:58:59 UTC, bearophile wrote:
monarch_dodra:
*I* think it should. File a report, and I'll see what I can do
about it. The problem with these kinds of things though might
be breaking existing code...
Given the frequency of bugs caused by such functions that
require a pointer to the data, I think that a breaking change
is the smaller problem.
Bye,
bearophile
I actually didn't think that a ptr (to output range) would work.
This way we can have best of both worlds and I'm happy with it.
