On 8/30/13, Namespace <[email protected]> wrote: > I hate this "magic" library fix.. Why cannot we use 'scope' for > this? > I know currently it is an unsafe feature that was also proposed > for rejection, but it would look better, feel better, and the > compiler could take the dirty work for us. And maybe better > optimized.
It would also avoid this nasty issue: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10921
