On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 22:01:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
That's clever, but I'm not sure I understand the bit about anonymous functions? You don't need anonymous functions to have recursion.
Sorry, that came out all wrong. What I meant was that it's neat to be able to do anonymous recursion without having to resort to tricks like the Y-Combinator. However, after some fiddling, it seems that this is actually not usable with anonymous functions, or at least, I couldn't find a way to do it.
