17-Jan-2013 22:34, Era Scarecrow пишет:
Thoughts? Feedback? I'm about ready to drop this and resume my
previous version and enhance it with recent experiences.
Feel free to do it how you see it. It's just that I think the
semantics of the previous version can't be improved to a consistent
state.
Sure they can, drop the compact part of it and leave it fully dynamic
(or vise-verse). But that would make some people unhappy; On the other
hand we could go hybrid where I take the new storage implementations and
allow template versions based on needs, remove the compact related
stuff, but then it's almost back to the separate slice design. Hmmm...
Should the slices be 'use at your own risk' when you tamper with the
original BitArray? How else should it be?
I'm thinking that a opSlice of stack-allocated must be @system and a
heap allocated can be @safe.
Possibly there are better ways to handle this.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
