On 7/31/12, monarch_dodra <monarchdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The bug is only when the field is EXACTLY 32 bits BTW. bitfields > works quite nice with 33 or whatever. More details in the report.
Yeah 32 or 64 bits, thanks for changing the title.
On 7/31/12, monarch_dodra <monarchdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The bug is only when the field is EXACTLY 32 bits BTW. bitfields > works quite nice with 33 or whatever. More details in the report.
Yeah 32 or 64 bits, thanks for changing the title.