On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:09:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tobias Pankrath:

Works as designed: http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove

Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959

Bye,
bearophile

Hit this one today,

Has `removeAt` or `removeAtIndex` be added to the std lib?

BTW, for associative array, `remove()` is in-place; but here for std.algorithm.mutation.remove (*keyword*: mutation), one need to do

```
  array = array.remove(index);  // return a new container

  // v.s.
  aa.remove(key);  // return bool (if it's removed)
```

This in-consistence is really bad.


Reply via email to