Re: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[zjh via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 13:07:56 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:

yeah the whole module behaviour with `private` is just a 
massive turn off tbh, it needs to be changed to match the Java 
style


They don't even admit the smaller the encapsulation, the better.