On Wednesday, 11 May 2022 at 12:29:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
How about being more explicit in the UDA ? The idea would be to associate the enum value to a type or not:
I think that could work but would require some major changes to my existing code. Also, I think I'd prefer:
```
@Token{
enum lparen = '(';
enum rparen = ')';
enum if_token;
}
```
to what you suggested as a user of the library.
