On Friday, 17 December 2021 at 18:19:34 UTC, Denis Feklushkin
wrote:
On Friday, 17 December 2021 at 18:01:03 UTC, Tejas wrote:
I think since `immutable` objects are kept in Read Only Storage
Some of them can be stored in ROM in some cases, but actually
"immutable" keyword means "not mutable for whole its lifetime"
Well, it would be really weird if destructors successfully
executed for some class of `immutable` qualified objects but
didn't for others.
Not too much of a stretch to imagine that destruction for
immutable objects was outright disallowed.
Someone who can explain this behaviour more thoroughly would be
much appreciated 😊
Maybe we should allow finalizers to mutate their instance?
