On Monday, 20 September 2021 at 12:23:00 UTC, Learner wrote:
I was expecting something like going out of scope for that
```(D)
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
~this()
{
writeln("S is being destructed");
}
}
void main()
{
S[int] aa;
aa[1] = S();
aa.remove(1);
writeln("Why no dtor call on remove?");
}
I was expecting S instance dtor called
S is being destructed
```
This looks to me like a bug, as
```d
import core.memory : GC;
GC.collect;
```
immediately after the `.remove` will call the struct's destructor.
I only see https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20379 as
related, though.
Here's another workaround:
```d
alias purge = (kv, k) { kv[k] = typeof(kv[k]).init; kv.remove(k);
};
```
with the same caveat of the `.init` structs also getting
destructed later, you can use that in place of `.remove`.