On Tuesday, 20 April 2021 at 19:56:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I have had the need in some cases to *maybe* set a const value
inside a loop. One can sometimes abstract this into a lambda
function, but sometimes this is not possible (e.g. if the loop
is static). Not only that, but I may also want to keep
processing the loop and do something different if the value has
already been set instead of returning immediately, which
necessitates a second loop.
[...]
This is a feature that I wanted always since my C# and C++ time.
I've tried to mimic it with class/struct (including readonly with
C++) but it isn't same thing.
