On Monday, 20 July 2020 at 17:24:56 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
Well perhaps you do parse a "constant-offset expression" i.e. syntactically dotted with constant indexes, like name1.name2[constant].name3 and then later there's a semantic check that the "constant-offset expression" involves no indirections when an offset into the top level object is computed. Then it's treated like any other attribute of a struct with a known offset.
Perhaps this could also work for a class at the top with recursively embedded structs and value arrays.
