Don wrote:
Phil Deets wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:18:46 -0500, Simen kjaeraas
<[email protected]> wrote:
Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't
know what
is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or
something
else that makes sense?
C++ abandoned default int. I think it would be best for D to do the same.
D never had default int. When there's an error, the compiler just has to
choose *some* type, so that it doesn't crash <g>.
It could be an Error type (that's not an alias for int type) that don't
start to spit errors everywhere and instead just blocks all further
errors on that type.
