Greetings, Nico Rikken! >> This is a known weakness of the current shape specification. I've tried to >> reverse engineer what's currently implemented some while ago: >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2008-July/msg00084.html >> >> But IIRC nothing was changes due to the huge amount of exisiting shapes.
> That is unfortunate, since it would straighten-out shape definitions. I > guess just adjusting all upstream shapes wouldn't be sufficient since > users might have custom shapes to work with. If the change is straightforward and clearly beneficial, it wouldn't be a problem to edit custom shapes to comply with new standards. At least, I have no objection to edit mine... :D Or even write a script that would do it automatically (since shapes are XML documents, transforming them is a trivial task in simple cases). -- WBR, Andrey Repin ([email protected]) 05.11.2014, <5:56> Sorry for my terrible english... _______________________________________________ dia-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
