Greetings, dunn! > If this is more of an svg question and not something particular to Dia, > just let me know please!
> All through the sample files, the shapes have xml like this, with two > calls to ellipses, rectangles, circles: > <svg:svg> > <svg:ellipse style="fill: default" cx="5" cy="5" rx="7" ry="7"/> > <svg:ellipse style="fill: none; fill-opacity:0; stroke-width: 0.1; > stroke: #000000" cx="5" cy="5" rx="7" ry="7"/> > </svg:svg> > ...but I get the same effect with just one call and a thicker > stroke-width like this: > <svg:svg> > <svg:ellipse style="fill: default; stroke-width:1" cx="5" cy="5" > rx="7" ry="7"/> > </svg> > I really don't even see how the sample files get a thick line from this, > since stroke-width:0.1 gives a hairline and the radii are the same in > both the calls. > Is there a reason to make shapes the first way as opposed to the second? This is a deficiency of Dia's shape exporter. I'm either make shapes by hands (if shape is simple enough, or if I need precise results), or proof-read and cleanup the shape after export (if shape is a complex/compound object). -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@freemail.ru) 27.07.2014, <12:41> Sorry for my terrible english... _______________________________________________ dia-list mailing list dia-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
