Hey thanks much I found the new one in the links below.. The new one works! Its pretty zippy too.. (20 second loads so you have a sense of it on at 13 layer set ) Its probably a bit stupid to hide this all in layers when the basic objects are really the same.. (just the attributes/values are changing for each "layer"). It may be better to move to sorting out how the python scripting works and hide the data in a file somewhere and use the python script to modify the attributes / layers on each click. But regardless this does work for now!
-regards, -avi On 3/23/09 11:32 AM, "Hans Breuer" <[email protected]> wrote: > At 23.03.2009 14:48, avijit ghosh wrote: > [...] >> http://dia-installer.de/index_en.html >> >> >> (both the .94 version and the 0.96 version) seems to be extremely buggy for >> some reason under Windows XP Pro SP2. Its buggy to the point that its not >> really usable. I have tried this both natively and under vmware. The same >> .dia files read/write perfectly fine on the fink/darwinports version of Mac >> OS X, linux as well as the cygwinports windows version. >> > There is a difference between being "extremly buggy" and e.g. producing the > same output on all platforms. Which one are you complaining about? > > Also is it a coincidence you are leaving out 0.95 - which was up until > recently the one I'm using for diagramming work under windoze? > > No matter of your definition of "extremly buggy" you may want to take a at > Dia 0.97-pre2 - it is intended to be better in both cases ;) > >> I unfortunately don¹t have a MS compiler here but I¹d be willing to help >> someone do someone do some debugging with regards to sorting out what >> exactly is going on. Is there a newer version of this that is available? > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2009-February/msg00057.html > >> The >> files I am generating are actually pretty complex (100 megs or so >> compressed) and it may be tripping up against a bug somewhere.. >> > I never used a Diagram with more than about thousand objects - and even > that was for pure testing purpose. Last time I did I've found e.g. > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562574 > > If your requirment is not a typo, I think you are stressing Dia far above > its limits (millions of objects?). There are a few algoritms with n^2 or > even worse which I would expect to make Dia with a lot of objects unuseable > on Linux, too. > > May I ask what use case requires a diagram which never can be read completely? > > Hans > > -------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org ----------- > Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to > get along without it. -- Dilbert > _______________________________________________ > dia-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list > FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq > Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia > _______________________________________________ dia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
