Ian Smith said: > I don't know if "shapes" are licensed, but when I contributed shapes to > dia, > it was with retained copyright and a GPL based license. Is this a > discussion > to change the license? > > On 2/20/07, Mike Inggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Which application do you have in mind? I am sure it is not a problem. >> >> Regards >> >> Mike >> >> >> On 16/02/07, Matt Jeneson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, I need to gain a clear answer as to whether or not i will be able >> to >> > include your application on to a cd for our students. We are currently >> > producing a cd based on www.theopencd.org with their permission and >> feel >> > your application would be hugely helpfull to our students. >> > >> > For me to get permisson to make the cd middle management like to have >> > clear answers and get scared by GNU and GPL! :) >> > >> > The app would come in its orginal distrubution package and would have >> an >> > info page linking to your site as well as a description making it >> clear its >> > authors.... >> >
No discussion of new license here. All copyright holders for the Dia code have released their code under the GPL, and it would be infeasible to find them all to change it. If the original poster is not willing to distribute Dia under the GPL, then he cannot distribute it. I as current maintainer can clearly say that he can distribute it all he wants as longs as it is done in accordance with the GPL. -Lars _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list Dia-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
