On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 12:10 -0500, Rob McDonald wrote: > > A bug report with a some summary of this mail is the right thing to do. > > It does not matter much if you reopen the previous one or open a new one. > > Ok, I'll do that. > > > Talking of UML (class?) diagram I had another issue with the matapost > > plug-in: collision with TeX escapes and special chars marking the > > access of class members. Could you try Self/dia-core.dia and suggest > > some solution (maybe escaping as done in pstricks?). > > Yeah, I'm talking about the class diagram. I'm using it for a database > schema, so whatever you want to call it... [...] > Of course, this problem will always be there. LaTeX does pretty things like > ligature (special merged hybrid characters) on ff and fi. It also does > kerning (squishing together to remove inter-letter white space) on letter > combinations like VA. Dia won't ever match this, so very subtle text width > problems will always persist. Of course, these are really small problems...
Yes, those problems exist with almost all exporters. > A much larger issue is if a user wants to insert a LaTeX formula into a > box... > > $E=M\ c^2$ > > MetaPost export will handle this fine for now, but Dia doesn't have any clue > as to the actual width and height of this text. Imagine if someone were > entering an array or a large, complex equation with bulky fractions. (This > is another reason that I think you should always be able to override the > width of a box, even if the text then overflows the sides. Because, when > LaTeX renders it, its width may be really different. However, I see this is > a LaTeX only feature, and isn't very important.) As I see it, we can either want to have full LaTeX rendering in Dia (i.e. call out to LaTeX to get a rendering) or have the LaTeX output be as close to what's in the diagram as possible. That would give the least surprises. A nice thing would be to be able to toggle if a given text should be tex-interpreted or not, but since right now we have no call-out to LaTeX, we're going to exact rendering as best we can. For an actual LaTeX rendering, we'd want to be able to give some context, of course, but if we can get a bitmap from the dvi output (which is possible), we can kinda treat that as an image in Dia. Trying to actually understand and calculate what LaTeX does to our text would IMHO just create more headaches than solutions. > An example of this kind of functionality is the TeXPoint PowerPoint plugin. > A guy has developed an open-source powerpoint plugin that lets you use LaTeX > as an equation writer (bitmap image generator) for PowerPoint. Double click > on the image, and a LaTeX text editor opens up. Change the equation, click > OK, and it seamlessly compiles the LaTeX to a specified resolution bitmap, > and imports it into PowerPoint. It is pretty slick... He did it with his > own home-brew LaTeX distribution. Making a similar technology > cross-platform would be a nightmare. Exactly what I'm hoping for. I would be happy to include something like that (though probably not for homebrew LaTeX only). -Lars _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list Dia-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
