At 14:23 09.06.03 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 08:11:54 -0500 Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess I didn't explain clearly. In 0.91, we don't include font
>> definitions. We don't rely on built-in fonts. We don't use any fonts in
>> the EPS at all. We convert each character to a set of curves and so avoid
>> the font definition problem totally. However, this means that PS
>> conversion tools are useless text-wise, and apparently PDF isn't too happy
>> either.
>
>No, you were perfectly clear.
>
>The question is: why not allow us the 0.90 solution
>(i.e., reliance on built in fonts)?
>
It should be quite simple to resurrect, in fact it's
partly done already:
2002-10-15 Hans Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* app/diapsrenderer.[hc] : (new files, old content :-)
simple base class for post script rendering. Does neither
use Pango/FT2 nor does it handle non latin1 characters.
The fancy stuff which nowadays appears to be needed should
probably be done in derived class(es)
searching for DiaPsRender shows only two occurences of it
in app/render_eps.c where is instantiated with
renderer = g_object_new (DIA_TYPE_PS_RENDERER, NULL);
Currently this is only done in the else branch of HAVE_FREETYPE
(the win32 default).
If the old refactored PS Renderer can do what you want it
probably should be made available in _addition_ to the
DiaPsFt2Renderer, i.e. as additional export filter ...
Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html
Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
