> > Sorry for the incovenience. The M$ compiler docs claim this construct to > > be correct (there is no warning at all for the redefinition and at least > > for C++ this is standard conform :) See : > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclang98/ht > > ml/_pluslang_redeclaration_of_typedef_names.asp > > For ANSI C, declarator identifiers have to be unique (see K&R 2.ed p216 and > 219). So it's a no-no.
Incidentally, why are we referring to the Microsoft compiler docs as evidence of the standard? Levi _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list FAQ at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html Main page at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia
