Christopher Faylor wrote: > Anyway, I've gone to some considerable effort to improve -mno-cygwin. > No reason for you to believe me but there's also no reason for you to > continue to misrepresent the state of -mno-cygwin since things have > changed and your information is now obsolete. > > >Sorry, too much negative personal experience with cygwin on my side
Can this discussion about -mno-cygwin be moved to the Cygwin list? FWIW, MinGW doesn't support -mno-cygwin. Thanks, Earnie. _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
