Hi, thanks for your explanations.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Lars Clausen wrote: > No, Dia does not have hatches. We're more geared towards structured > diagrams than vector art. It is a good suggestion, though. I see hatches mostly essential for technical diagrams, not as a part of vector art. Ideally, the hatches should be very flexible (colour, line style, angle, distance between lines, ...). > 0.88.1 was quite unstable. 0.90 is much better. Yes, dia becomes definitely more and more stable. Unfortunately, I had data losses on dia crashes. How about an "auto-save" feature like in Emacs? > > functions are already there (but I did find them), or maybe > > one could port good ol' XFig to GTK+? :-) > > That's been done: <URL:http://k332.feld.cvut.cz/~lemming/projects/gtkfig.html> This project seems to be not very active (last version 0.7.x of 1999) and more a rewrite than a port. Anyway, I didn't mean this too serious, and of course, the "XFig vs. dia" wasn't meant as a fight, more as a productive competition. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
