On 2002-06-25 at 19:15 +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > It seems you junk and non-junk addresses are going to be > pretty much the same shortly... Aaah, the wonders of > procmail+spamassassin...
Yeah, I subscribe to dia-list under andrew.junk, but may change this --- my role in Pine defaults to andrew, and the mailing list rejects that --- causes grief to whoever is mailing list admin no doubt. So must think of a way round it. > The released tarball (not the snapshots) is built by running > "make dist". This does involve pretty heavily automake. OK. > Currently, AUTHORS is only an EXTRA_DIST file; which means > "dead weight 'make dist' has to carry over for building a > tarball, but that's it". Right. I presume 'make install' from the tarball version will install AUTHORS (haven't tested this, will do in a second). > I've just got an idea: why not decide that the C structure is > the "authoritative" one, and add a flag --credits, which > would simply print them (roughly with the same format as the > current AUTHORS file). We would then build AUTHORS from the > dia binary rather than the other way around... > > (with a small dependency like > > AUTHORS: app/dia app/run_dia.sh app/commands.c > app/run_dia.sh --credits > AUTHORS > > ) This would also nicely take care of the Win32 "problem". Sounds nifty. OK, will look into doing this then --- try and develop a patch for it. Thanks for all the explanation. Sorry, really should probably sit down and read automake/autoconf documentation sometime soon, as only have a hazy understanding of how it all works. Can anyone recommend a good introductory document? Regards, Andrew. -- Andrew Ferrier email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.new-destiny.co.uk/andrew/ _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
