On Tue, 14 May 2002, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> On 2002-05-14 at 19:27, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> 
>> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 19:27:06 +0100 (BST)
>> From: Andrew Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Dia segfaults with diagram tree
>>
>> I checked and 0.90 RC1 is still generating UML generalizations
>> with a null length string for the name in the resulting XML
>> file, when you start from scratch with a new diagram. This
>> predictably causes it to crash every time when you open the
>> diagram tree window. I guess you probably want to fix this.
> 
> Hmm... sloppy thinking on my part. Guess that's OK actually as
> long as the symptom is fixed and that having null names for
> generalizations is also deemed OK.

I don't really think it is.  But I'm too lazy to dig through and fix it
right now.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?
_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list

Reply via email to