Le 29 Apr 2002 13:23:29 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: >> >> Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting the old >"abstract" attribute. This is just a matter of changing >> + op->inheritance_type = UML_POLYMORPHIC; >> - op->inheritance_type = UML_LEAF; >> inside objects/UML/uml.c ~500 > >I guess Cyrille applied your patch. >Problem is, now a lot of diagrams have been made with POLYMORPHIC as >default. How can we tell what a missing entry is supposed to be? Are they >always explicit now? >
I don't understand what you mean with entry. Is it the field/variable or XML attribute ? -- "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steven Wright MaT|TaM _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
