Hi there. > Okay, this seems to have gotten kind of disjointed. Agreed. Well, you want XML? In what color? Oh, never mind. ;) > 1. [no C++] Couldn't have put it better. > 2. [Schemas] Ok, can we just say, that some of the data is integer or float (maybe by defining an "integer" or "float" entity or some "type" attribute the parser can cope? I like the idea of letting libxml validate the stuff on the fly without coding overhead, and our (or better: my) parser has the conversion routines handy. :-) > 3. [DOM borrowing] So you would agree with my idea of a "callback hash" that links every behaviour-defining routine in a consistent manner? This hash could hold just about everything a C++ object can contain. The API definition is then just a matter of thought and planning. (and it could be changed at will without breaking too much things)... > Sorry to keep posting these manifestos; after this, aside from answering > direct questions, I'm going to try to avoid cluttering the list until I > have some code to show for all my big talk. (And of course, if that > never happens, then obviously you should have been ignoring me anyway ;) Why, thanks, Lennon. I feared nobody would share my thoughts; since I desperately want to create this extension by the end of august and I will need all help I can get. cu Andre -- Tolerance rulez, everything else sux! -- Andre Kloss _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
