Dear Knut Fully agree with your opinion about per favorite specification of name/short name/code.
*Nayeem Al Mifthah* *Health Information Systems Specialist* Support to the National HMIS MIS, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh Telephone: +880-2-58816459 | Fax: +880-2-58813875 | Mobile: +88-01914 030 574 Email: n.mift...@gmail.com | Skype: nayeem.a.m | LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/nayeemam On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Knut Staring <knu...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a lot of value in being able to select "short names" for > analytical outputs like charts and tables, but currently this is a system > setting, i.e. you have to make the decision for EVERYTHING. Would it not > make more sense to specify this PER FAVORITE? And should CODE be a third > option? > > To make it a slightly wider discussion, to what extent are people actually > using short names for? > > Thanks, > Knut > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users > Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
