Hi again, I tested 2.30 version with the same outcome. Is my previous explanation clear enough? I was about reporting this in JIRA as a bug but, since I am not sure of considering it such as, I'd rather ask you in advance...
Any lead on this would be much appreciated. Best, Eric 2018-05-24 18:04 GMT+02:00 Eric Barreda Prades <ericbarre...@gmail.com>: > Dear developers, > > I'm a little confused about the term "public" regarding user permissions > and I'd really appreciate any lead on this. Imagine that we have the > following case: > > > - User B has a role with permissions on See Pivot Table. > > User A creates a table and shares it with B and set it as Public access > --> none > > > When User B tries to update and save that table this is the result > > > It seems that User B need to have the permission *Add/ Update Public > Report Table* in order to edit/share that table. From my understanding, > as the table was set to Public --> none I should not need to add that > permission to user B. > > So, what is the meaning of "Public" here? Is any shared resource > considered as public even if it is shared only to a user/usergroup? Is this > the expected behaviour or is it a bug? (Tested for play version 2.28. Not > possible to access to 2.29 since yesterday). > > Ideally, we'd rather avoid giving this permission since then all users' > tables are created with Public edit/view permissions by default. > > Best, > > Eric > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
